TY - JOUR
T1 - Bank liquidity and capital shocks in unconventional times
AU - Baros, A.
AU - Croci, Ettore
AU - Elliot, V.
AU - Willesson, M.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This paper examines bank liquidity management following capital shocks under capital and liquidity regulation in a period of unconventional monetary policies. Studying European banks between 2010 and 2018, we find that bank liquidity is generally not affected by a negative capital shock. Capital shocks are nevertheless transmitted into liquidity positions through balance sheet adjustments. Addressing bank-level balance sheet policies, we find that the banks de-risk assets by replacing corporate loans with financial securities, especially if the shock takes place during periods of heightened central bank interventions. Moreover, asset-side-dominant risk-reducing behavior goes against regulatory intent and indicates that regulatory arbitrage considerations affect banks’ responses to shocks. Finally, we document heterogeneous responses by banks depending on their size, type, and country. These findings imply that compliance with regulation may lead to partial shortages in corporate lending, with banks prioritizing investment in government securities in event of a capital shock.
AB - This paper examines bank liquidity management following capital shocks under capital and liquidity regulation in a period of unconventional monetary policies. Studying European banks between 2010 and 2018, we find that bank liquidity is generally not affected by a negative capital shock. Capital shocks are nevertheless transmitted into liquidity positions through balance sheet adjustments. Addressing bank-level balance sheet policies, we find that the banks de-risk assets by replacing corporate loans with financial securities, especially if the shock takes place during periods of heightened central bank interventions. Moreover, asset-side-dominant risk-reducing behavior goes against regulatory intent and indicates that regulatory arbitrage considerations affect banks’ responses to shocks. Finally, we document heterogeneous responses by banks depending on their size, type, and country. These findings imply that compliance with regulation may lead to partial shortages in corporate lending, with banks prioritizing investment in government securities in event of a capital shock.
KW - Bank liquidity
KW - capital shock
KW - regulation
KW - regulatory arbitrage
KW - unconventional monetary policy
KW - Bank liquidity
KW - capital shock
KW - regulation
KW - regulatory arbitrage
KW - unconventional monetary policy
UR - https://publicatt.unicatt.it/handle/10807/230088
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145488708&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85145488708&origin=inward
U2 - 10.1080/1351847X.2022.2146521
DO - 10.1080/1351847X.2022.2146521
M3 - Article
SN - 1351-847X
VL - 2022
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - European Journal of Finance
JF - European Journal of Finance
IS - N/A
ER -